Usefulness of Acetic Acid Spray with Narrow-Band Imaging for Identifying the Margin of Sessile Serrated Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precursors of colon cancer, especially in cases of large, right colon. However, they are difficult to not only detect, but only clarify the margin of the lesion, which can lead to the poor endoscopic treatment outcomes. AIMS: This study evaluated the usefulness of acetic acid spray with narrow-band imaging (A-NBI) for the better visualization of the margin of SSLs. METHODS: From January 2013 to March 2022, patients with superficial elevated polyps suspected of being SSLs ≥ 10 mm with an endoscopic diagnosis that had been endoscopically resected at Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital were enrolled. Endoscopic images with white-light imaging (WLI), narrow-band imaging (NBI), indigo-carmine (IC), and A-NBI were recorded in each lesion and were randomly arranged and assessed by 10 endoscopists. We compared the visibility score (1 to 4) and color differences (ΔE) between inside and outside of the lesions among WLI, NBI, IC, and A-NBI. RESULTS: Forty-one lesions in 33 cases were included, and a total of 164 images were evaluated. As for the visibility score, most of the lesions were scored as 1 or 2 on WLI, whereas most were scored 4 on A-NBI. The median ΔE of A-NBI was also significantly higher than that of WLI, NBI, or IC (20.5 vs. 8.3 vs. 8.2 vs. 12.3, P < 0.01). A significant correlation was observed between the color difference and visibility score (r = 0.53, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A-NBI may be a useful modality for identifying the margin of SSLs.

The preoperative M2BPGi score predicts operative difficulty and the incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Liver fibrosis or cirrhosis frequently makes parenchymal transection more difficult, but the difficulty score of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), including the IWATE criteria, does not include a factor related to liver fibrosis. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate M2BPGi as a predictor of the difficulty of parenchymal transection and the incidence of postoperative complications in LLR. METHODS: Data from 54 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial liver resection (LLR-P) and 24 patients who underwent laparoscopic anatomical liver resection between 2017 and 2019 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. All cases were classified according to M2BPGi scores, and reserve liver function, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared among these groups. RESULTS: Sixteen cases (29.6%) were M2BPGi negative (cut-off index < 1.0), 25 cases (46.3%) were 1+ (1.0 ≤ cut-off index < 3.0), and 13 cases (24.1%) were 2+ (cut-off index ≥ 3.0). M2BPGi-positive cases had significantly worse hepatic reserve function (K-ICG: 0.16 vs 0.14 vs 0.08, p < 0.0001). Intraoperative bleeding was significantly greater in M2BPGi-positive cases [50 ml vs 150 ml vs 200 ml, M2BPGi (-) or (1+) vs M2BPGi (2+), p = 0.045]. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II) were significantly more frequent in M2BPGi-positive cases [0% vs 4% vs 33%, M2BPGi (-) or (1+) vs M2BPGi (2+), p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: M2BPGi could predict surgical difficulty and complications in LLR-P. In particular, it might be better not to select M2BPGi (2+) cases as teaching cases because of the massive bleeding during parenchymal transection.

Current evidence and issues of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms during antithrombotic therapy.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms is a useful treatment globally. However, postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD is a serious, and sometimes life-threatening complication in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs, because antithrombotic drugs are considered to increase the risk of postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD. In contrast, withdrawal of antithrombotic drugs during the perioperative period increases the risk of thrombotic complications. Guidelines for the management of antithrombotic drugs during the periendoscopic period have been published by different countries, and recent guidelines place greater emphasis on the risk of thromboembolism with the discontinuation of antithrombotic drugs than on the risk of bleeding with the continuation of antithrombotic drugs. Several studies have reported on the validity of these guidelines, and clinical evidence is being established. Most studies reported that gastric ESD under continuation of aspirin or cilostazol did not increase the risk of bleeding, whereas heparin replacement was strongly associated with a higher risk of bleeding. However, the data regarding some clinical issues about the management of antithrombotic drugs, such as the safety of gastric ESD under continuation of thienopyridine, administration of multiple antithrombotic drugs including dual antiplatelet and anticoagulants (warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant), and effective prophylactic methods for postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD are lacking. Larger clinical data are needed to resolve the remaining issues in the future.